Help
Sully Sauce
Quote
I'm not a conspiracy theorist...
... But I'm also not into coincidence theories, either.
I'm VERY troubled by yesterday's ditching of Flight 1549. It doesn't make sense to me.
Consider these points:
- Apparently, a flock of birds knocked out two engines but didn't leave an impact on the nose (as you know much more flimsy than engines).
- This picture is heavily Photoshopped... when you zoom in, you see all sorts of cut and paste artwork... even the USAir logo is pasted onto the plane. Why?
Also in this picture are dozens and dozens of "survivors"... it's hard to count because the picture is so fuzzy and distant (a common theme... distant and fuzzy pics). How can more than 20 people stand on a wing and not collapse it?
- Where are the closeup pictures... if you watch any of the coverage yesterday, all of the camera angles were distant shots... even with the media within hundreds of yards of the scene. Why?
- As of this moment, I've yet to see a single video of the ditching... not one, And I've searched everywhere (including YouTube) -- how can this be? Everyone seems to have a cell phone these days... especially in New York. What about CCTV cameras from the Port Authority... someone has to have a video of this, yet we see nothing. Why?
- One pilot (who if I remember posted here in this thread) lived near the crash scene admits he didn't see the plane ditch... didn't hear the plane ditch, but then saw the plane floating. Odd don't you think?
- The only witnesses of the actual ditching were members of the media (who as you know cover all sorts of things up)... example:
"I just thought, 'Why is it so low?' And, splash, it hit the water," said witness Barbara Sambriski, a researcher at The Associated Press.
- The media is reporting, "It appears to be the first time that a large commercial jet liner ever has made a successful controlled landing into a body of water." Another coincidence. A "Miracle" is the media mantra about this. Can this plane really survive a ditching without nearly a scratch... really?
I could go on and on with minor stuff, but I hope you get my drift.
Your thoughts?
... But I'm also not into coincidence theories, either.
I'm VERY troubled by yesterday's ditching of Flight 1549. It doesn't make sense to me.
Consider these points:
- Apparently, a flock of birds knocked out two engines but didn't leave an impact on the nose (as you know much more flimsy than engines).
- This picture is heavily Photoshopped... when you zoom in, you see all sorts of cut and paste artwork... even the USAir logo is pasted onto the plane. Why?
Also in this picture are dozens and dozens of "survivors"... it's hard to count because the picture is so fuzzy and distant (a common theme... distant and fuzzy pics). How can more than 20 people stand on a wing and not collapse it?
- Where are the closeup pictures... if you watch any of the coverage yesterday, all of the camera angles were distant shots... even with the media within hundreds of yards of the scene. Why?
- As of this moment, I've yet to see a single video of the ditching... not one, And I've searched everywhere (including YouTube) -- how can this be? Everyone seems to have a cell phone these days... especially in New York. What about CCTV cameras from the Port Authority... someone has to have a video of this, yet we see nothing. Why?
- One pilot (who if I remember posted here in this thread) lived near the crash scene admits he didn't see the plane ditch... didn't hear the plane ditch, but then saw the plane floating. Odd don't you think?
- The only witnesses of the actual ditching were members of the media (who as you know cover all sorts of things up)... example:
"I just thought, 'Why is it so low?' And, splash, it hit the water," said witness Barbara Sambriski, a researcher at The Associated Press.
- The media is reporting, "It appears to be the first time that a large commercial jet liner ever has made a successful controlled landing into a body of water." Another coincidence. A "Miracle" is the media mantra about this. Can this plane really survive a ditching without nearly a scratch... really?
I could go on and on with minor stuff, but I hope you get my drift.
Your thoughts?
some response article: http://www.layscience.net/node/472
had to lol at the Layscientist's final thoughts:
Quote
My Hudson River Conspiracy Predictions
1) Questions will be asked about "missing" wreckage (e.g. the engines)
2) Like the steel building crap in 9/11, they will go on about the likelihood of a plane surviving an impact with water.
3) Why was the river cleared? The only way a busy river could be clear is if someone arranged it in advance...
4) Links will be made to Obama's inauguration.
5) Something relating to the passengers who were on board - their jobs, or no list being issued, or similar.
6) Something about the Jews. Conspiracy theorists seem to have a big thing about the Jews.
1) Questions will be asked about "missing" wreckage (e.g. the engines)
2) Like the steel building crap in 9/11, they will go on about the likelihood of a plane surviving an impact with water.
3) Why was the river cleared? The only way a busy river could be clear is if someone arranged it in advance...
4) Links will be made to Obama's inauguration.
5) Something relating to the passengers who were on board - their jobs, or no list being issued, or similar.
6) Something about the Jews. Conspiracy theorists seem to have a big thing about the Jews.
This post has been edited by HowlinMadMurdoc: 11 February 2009 - 05:58 PM
